Controversial internet personality Andrew Tate will not face criminal prosecution in the United Kingdom over allegations made by four women who have accused him of sexual violence. The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) announced that the evidence available does not meet the legal threshold required to bring criminal charges. However, the accusations remain at the centre of an ongoing civil lawsuit at the High Court in London.
The decision has sparked renewed debate about the legal standards required for criminal prosecution, the rights of alleged victims, and the complex legal battles surrounding Tate, a highly polarising social media figure known for his outspoken and often inflammatory views on women.
Serious Allegations Raised by Four Women
The case stems from accusations made by four women who allege they experienced sexual violence and abusive behaviour by Tate between 2013 and 2015. According to the claims presented in the civil proceedings, the women accuse the influencer of multiple acts of violence and intimidation.
One woman alleges that Tate grabbed her by the throat on several occasions in 2015, while another claims he whipped her with a belt. In another allegation, Tate is said to have pointed a gun directly at a woman’s face during an encounter.
These accusations form the basis of the civil case currently moving through the High Court in London. In civil proceedings, the standard of proof is lower than in criminal cases, meaning the court determines whether claims are more likely than not to be true rather than requiring proof beyond reasonable doubt.
Tate has strongly denied all allegations.
CPS Says Legal Test for Criminal Charges Not Met
On Monday, the Crown Prosecution Service confirmed it would not pursue criminal charges after reviewing the available evidence provided by Hertfordshire Police.
A spokesperson for the CPS explained that the case file had undergone a further review relating to alleged incidents of assault and rape between 2013 and 2015. After evaluating the evidence, prosecutors determined that the legal requirements for initiating a criminal prosecution were not satisfied.
“We undertook a further review of a case file in relation to allegations of assault and rape between 2013 and 2015,” the CPS said in a statement.
“Following careful consideration of the evidence provided by Hertfordshire Constabulary, we concluded that our legal test for prosecution was not met, and that no further action should be taken.”
The CPS added that all parties involved had been informed of the decision. Officials also offered to meet with the complainants to provide a more detailed explanation of the reasoning behind the decision.
Tate’s Legal Team Welcomes Decision
Andrew Tate’s legal representatives quickly welcomed the announcement. They said the CPS had made the correct decision based on the evidence available.
Tate’s Solicitor argued that the outcome demonstrated that the allegations could not meet the standard required to secure a conviction in criminal court.
“Despite much external pressure, the evidence speaks for itself in this case and the Crown Prosecution Service have rightly confirmed the evidence is inadequate to provide any realistic prospect of conviction,” he said.
He suggested that the details of the case would become clearer during the ongoing civil proceedings and maintained that the accusations against Tate were unfounded.
“The reason the CPS made this decision will become obvious when the evidence is played out during the civil proceedings,” he said.
Ford added that the outcome represented another instance in which attempts to bring criminal charges against Tate had not succeeded.
“We are glad that this is yet another example of a potential criminal case against Andrew Tate falling by the wayside.”
Civil Case Continues in the High Court
Although prosecutors have declined to bring criminal charges, the legal battle is far from over. The four women have pursued a civil lawsuit against Tate after the CPS originally chose not to prosecute in 2019.
Three of the women had previously reported their allegations to Hertfordshire Police, which conducted an investigation at the time. That investigation was eventually closed the same year without charges being filed.
In response, the women launched a civil claim against Tate in the High Court. Civil proceedings allow individuals to seek damages or compensation for alleged harm, even when criminal charges are not brought.
Tate, now 38, has consistently rejected the accusations. He has described the claims made against him as “a pack of lies” and “gross fabrications”.
Lawyers for the Women Express Disappointment
The legal team representing the women reacted with disappointment to the CPS decision.
Matt Jury, a lawyer at McCue Jury & Partners who is acting on behalf of the claimants, said the decision not to prosecute was frustrating for the alleged victims.
While he did not comment extensively on the reasoning behind the CPS decision, he emphasised that the women remain committed to pursuing justice through the civil courts.
“The CPS’s decision is disappointing,” Jury said.
For the claimants, the civil case represents an opportunity to have their allegations examined in court even though criminal charges will not proceed.
Separate Criminal Charges Still Pending
Despite the CPS decision regarding these specific allegations, Andrew Tate remains entangled in other serious legal matters in the United Kingdom.
In May, prosecutors announced that they had authorised 21 criminal charges against Andrew Tate and his brother Tristan Tate after receiving evidence from Bedfordshire Police.
The charges are connected to separate allegations involving several alleged victims.
Andrew Tate faces 10 charges relating to three alleged victims. These include accusations of rape, causing actual bodily harm, human trafficking and controlling prostitution for financial gain.
His younger brother Tristan Tate, 37, faces 11 charges linked to a separate alleged victim. The accusations against him include rape, human trafficking and causing actual bodily harm.
Both brothers deny the allegations.
International Legal Complications
The legal situation surrounding the Tate brothers has been complicated by ongoing proceedings outside the United Kingdom.
Bedfordshire Police obtained a European arrest warrant for the pair in 2024 in connection with the UK charges. However, authorities agreed that any extradition would be delayed until separate legal proceedings in Romania were completed.
The Tate brothers have been under investigation in Romania for alleged human trafficking and organised crime offences, claims they have also denied.
As a result, the timeline for any potential trial in the United Kingdom remains uncertain.
A Divisive Public Figure
Andrew Tate has built a large online following through social media platforms where he shares controversial opinions on masculinity, wealth and relationships. His outspoken views, particularly regarding women, have attracted both strong support and widespread criticism.
Self-described as a “misogynist,” Tate has repeatedly defended his views as expressions of personal opinion and free speech.
Critics, however, argue that his rhetoric contributes to harmful attitudes toward women and relationships. His influence has drawn concern from educators, policymakers and social commentators, particularly regarding the impact on younger audiences.
The ongoing legal disputes have only intensified the public spotlight on Tate and his activities.
Legal Questions Continue
While the CPS decision means Andrew Tate will not face criminal charges in relation to the allegations made by the four women, the broader legal picture remains unresolved.
The High Court civil case will provide a forum for the claims to be examined in detail, potentially bringing further evidence and testimony to light.
At the same time, the separate criminal charges authorised in the UK, along with investigations abroad, ensure that Tate’s legal battles are likely to continue for some time.
For now, prosecutors have made clear that in this particular case the available evidence does not meet the high bar required for criminal prosecution. Yet the allegations themselves remain part of an ongoing legal process that could still have significant consequences.
The Legal Times
29th September 2025
